DIGITALIZATION AS A FACTOR OF DEVELOPMENT OF ENTERPRISE PERSONNEL

Array

Authors

  • A.S. Polyanska Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Department of Management and administration, Carpathian str.,15, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76019
  • I.P. Kinash Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Department of Management and administration, Carpathian str.,15, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76019
  • S.V. Savchuk Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Department of Management and administration, Carpathian str.,15, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76019,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15330/apred.2.15.94-106

Keywords:

digitalization, “knowledge worker”, industry, training and development, personnel, enterprise

Abstract

The article deals with the relevance, prerequisites and directions of training and development of personnel in terms of digitalization in domestic practice. The concept of “knowledgeworker” and the characteristics of such employee's activity have been clarified (the main factors that determine the productivity of the personnel having special knowledge in their profession are given), the role of “knowledge worker” is defined. The concepts of “digital literacy” and “digital competence” are described as important characteristics of new knowledge.
Prerequisites for digitalization at domestic enterprises are analyzed. The dynamics of the use of information and communication technologies at enterprises is investigated. Indicators were analyzed: the share of enterprises using computers by industry and the share of the average number of workers using the computer,% to the average number of employees of enterprises by industry. The benefits of digital enterprise are identified, as well as five key components of digitalization in Ukraine. Priority directions for reducing the “digital” gap in domestic practice are presented. Emphasis is placed on the digital competence of employees. An important feature of the acquisition of digital competencies is the way they are acquired, which is different from traditional academic training of professionals: on-the-job training, separate on digital platforms as a source of value formation in the digital economy.
The basic directions of development of digitalization of activity of domestic enterprises are substantiated. Attention is drawn to the obstacles to the widespread adoption of digital technologies in the activities of domestic enterprises. Ways of training and development of the personnel which influence on introduction of digital technologies in the enterprises of different branches are offered. It is concluded that the success of businesses will depend to a large extent on the “digital maturity” of staff, as well as their ability to use information using the appropriate digital technologies.

References

1. “Customers in a Digital Economy.” Mit sloanre, sloanreview.mit.edu/ article / rethinking-thevalue-ofcustomers-in-a-digital-economy. Accessed 22 Sept. 2019.
2. Colin, N., Landier, A., Mohnen, P., and A. Perrot. “The digital economy.” Cairn-info, www.cairn-int.info/article-E_NCAE_026_-0001--the-digital-economy. htm. Accessed 22 Sept. 2019.
3. Degryse, Christophe. “Digitization of the Economy and its Impact on Labor Markets.” SSRN, dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2730550. Accessed 22 Sept. 2019.
4. Parviainen, Päivi, Tihinen, Maarit, Kääriäinen, Jukka, and Susanna Teppola. “Tackling the digitalization challenge: how to benefit from digitization in practice.” International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, vol. 5, no. 1, 2017, рр. 63-77.
5. Kotarba, Marcin. “Measuring Digitalization - Key Metrics.” Foundations of Management, vol.9, issue 1, 2017, рр. 123–138.
6. Parker, Jeffrey, van Alstin, Marshall, and Sanjit Chaudary. “Platform revolution. How network markets are changing the economy - and how to make them work for you.” Sylgatulin Mikhail, neurons.kg/tpl/library/104.pdf. Accessed 22 Sept. 2019.
7. Drucker, Peter F. Knowledge-Worker Productivity: The Biggest Challenger. California Rewiew Management, vol. 41, no. 2, 1999, рр. 79-94.
8. Ferrari, Digital Competence in Practice: An Analysis of Frameworks, IPTS-JRC, 2011. URL: http: //ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC68116.pdf. Accessed 22 Sept. 2019.
9. Belshaw, D. “The Essential Elements of Digital Literacies.” 2011. Digitalliteraci, digitalliteraci.es/.Accessed 22 Sept. 2019.
10. “On approval of the Concept of development of the digital economy and society of Ukraine for 2018-2020 and approval of the plan of measures for its implementation. Order of CMU on January 17, 2018 No. 67-p.” Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/67-2018-% D1% 80. Accessed 22 Sept. 2019.
11. Karcheva, G.T., Ogorodnya, D.V., and V.A. Openka. “Digital economy and its influence on the development of national and international economy.” Financial space, no. 3 (27), 2017, рp. 13-21.
12. Kolyadenko, S.V. “Digital economy: preconditions and stages of formation in Ukraine and in the world.” Economy. Finances. Management, no.6, 2016, рр. 105-112.
13. Kraus, N.M., Goloborodko, O.P., and K.M. Kraus. “Digital economy: trends and perspectives of the avant-garde nature of development.” An efficient economy, no. 1, 2018, www.economy.nayka.com.ua / pdf / 1_- 2018 / 8.pdf. Accessed 22 Sept. 2019.
14. Fischuk, V. “The digital economy is real.” Biz, biz.nv.ua/eng. Accessed 22 Sept. 2019.
15. Lyashenko, V.I., and O.S. Vishnevsky. Digital modernization of the Ukrainian economy as an opportunity for breakthrough development: monograph, NAS of Ukraine, Institute of Industrial Economics. 2018.
16. Rudenko, M.V. “Digitization of the economy: new opportunities and prospects.” Economy and state, no. 11, 2018, рр. 61-65.
17. “Continuous learning is a prerequisite for success in the digital world.” e.ua, e.ua / ua / pro-kompaniiu / novyny / 1632-postijne-navchannya-obov-yazkova-minds-uspikhu-v-sviti-tsifrovizatsiji. Accessed 22 Sept. 2019.
18. “Every fourth machine in Germany is already connected to the Internet.” DW, www.dw.com/en/Accessed 22 Sept. 2019.
19. Davenport, Thomas H. Thinking For A Living: How to Get Better Performance and Results From Knowledge Workers, Harvard Business School Press. 2005.
20. Reinhardt, W.; Schmidt, B.; Sloep, P.; Drachsler, H. “Knowledge Worker Roles and Actions - Results of Two Empirical Studies.” Knowledge and Process Management, no. 18 (3), 2011, рр. 150-174. Wiley onlinelibrary, onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/kpm.378. Accessed 22 Sept. 2019.
21. Kuibida, V.S., Petroye, O.M., Fedulova, L.I., and G.O. Androshchuk. Digital competences as a condition for forming the quality of human capital, NADU. 2019.
22. Ferrari, A. Digital Competence in Practice: An Analysis of Frameworks, IPTS-JRC. 2011, http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC68116.pdf. Accessed 22 Sept. 2019.
23. “Use of information and communication technologies at Ukrainian enterprises.” State Statistics Service of Ukraine, ukrstat.gov.ua. Accessed 22 Sept. 2019.
24. Digital Agenda of Ukraine - 2020. Priority Areas, Initiatives, Projects of "Digitization" of Ukraine by 2020, KS High-tech office Ukraine, 2016. Torhovo-promyslova palata Ukrainy, ucci.org.ua/uploads/files/58e78ee3c3922.pdf. Accessed 22 Sept. 2019.
25. The Global Information Technology Report, 2016. World Economic Forum, www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-infor. Accessed 22 Sept. 2019.
26. “Ukraine's Export Strategy Research on Sectoral Strategy for the Development of Information and Communication Technologies 2019-2023.” GOOGLE https://www.google.com/search?q=Експортна+стратегія+України+Дослідження. Accessed 22 Sept. 2019 .
27. Ferchuk, O. “Digitalization of business: how Ukraine can catch up with world trends.” Ukrainska pravda, www. pravda.com.ua/columns/2018/ 12/26/643874. Accessed 22 Sept. 2019.

Published

2019-11-04