INFLUENCE SOCIO-ECONOMIC SITUATION ON THE EFFECTIVE USE OF MANPOWER AGRICULTURAL ENTERPRISES

Array

Authors

  • O.V. Lebid Dnipropetrovsk state agrarian–economic University, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Department of accounting, auditing and management Financial and economic protection, Voroshylova Str., 25, Dnipropetrovsk, 49010

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15330/apred.2.12.68-77

Keywords:

workforce, personnel, economic and social development, efficiency management, population, economically active population

Abstract

In the article, the socio-economic condition of the rural population of Ukraine is a potential basis for the formation of labor farms. Analyzes the quantity of the population of Ukraine. The experience of leading countries for the support of public authorities of the agricultural sector. Analyzes the rural development programs of developed countries and derived from their implementation results. The dependence of the social dimension of economic and determined that it is the main and fundamental, and is a driving force for social development.

JEL: Q 00

Author Biography

O.V. Lebid , Dnipropetrovsk state agrarian–economic University, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Department of accounting, auditing and management Financial and economic protection, Voroshylova Str., 25, Dnipropetrovsk, 49010

postgraduate

References

1. Dyshliuk, N.I. “Features regional rural development Ukraine.” Naukovyj visnyk NUBiP Ukrainy 3.154 (2010): 226-30. Print.
2. Zbars'kyj, V.K “Sustainable rural development: problems and prospects.” Ekonomika APK 11(2010):129-36. Print.
3. Klub, A.I. “Definition of perspective directions of rural development.” The task of the state, regional and municipal administration in the context of the new realities of national development: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. Kyiv: Publishing and printing center Municipal Management Academy, 2012. 194–97. Print.
4. Lytvyn, Yu.O. “The economic situation of contemporary Ukrainian village as the main component of its development.” Ekonomika ta derzhava 9 (2012): 119-22. Print.
5. Puhachov, M. Socio-economic status of rural Ukraine. Kyiv: IAE NAN Ukrainy, 2002. Print.
6. Ukraine Rural Development: Statistical yearbook. Кyiv: Derzhkomstat, 2013. Print.
7. Ukraine Rural Development: Statistical yearbook. Кyiv: Derzhkomstat, 2014. Print.
8. State Statistics Committee of Ukraine. Web. 10 May 2016. <http://ukrstat.gov.ua>.
9. Ukraine Rural Development: Statistical yearbook. Кyiv: Derzhkomstat, 2012. Print.
10. Agricultural Ukraine 2013: Statistical yearbook. Кyiv: Derzhkomstat, 2014. Print.
11. Agricultural Ukraine 2014: Statistical yearbook. Кyiv: Derzhkomstat, 2015. Print.
12. “The population of Ukraine.” Week.ua (2015). Web. 10 May 2016. <http://tyzhden.ua/News/132248>.
13. Vas'kivs'ka, K.V., and I.V. Sembai. “Socio-economic aspects of rural development.” Rehional'na ekonomika 2(52)(2009):142-148. Print.
14. Homo Economicus. “Abraham Maslow pyramid of needs.” Web. 12 May 2016. <http://www.homoeconomicus.club/піраміда-потреб-абрахама-маслоу>.
15. Zbars'kyi, V.K. “Social infrastructure as a factor in the reproduction of labor.” Naukovyj visnyk NUBiP Ukrainy 154(1) (2010): 152-60. Print.
16. Thomas, J. Vilsack Witch Crisis Comes Opportunity. Washington: DC, 2011. Print.
17. Dallas, T. The USDA Rural Development Mission. Washington: DC, 2011. Print.
18. U.S. Department of Education. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). 2013. Web. 12 May 2016. <http://www.ed.gov/open/plan/recovery-gov>.

Published

2016-04-26

Issue

Section

Research of development of domestic business