GEANT4 Study of Secondary Electron Emission in ZnO Nanorod Arrays under 10-100 MeV Oxygen Ion Irradiation

Authors

  • V. Kotsyubynsky Vasyl Stefanyk Carpathian National University, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
  • M. Cholewa Institute of Physics, College of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Rzeszow, Poland
  • V. Kindrat Vasyl Stefanyk Carpathian National University, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
  • V. Boychuk Vasyl Stefanyk Carpathian National University, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
  • N. Mentynskyi Vasyl Stefanyk Carpathian National University, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
  • R. Abaszade Azerbaijan University of Architecture and Construction, Baku, Azerbaijan; Azerbaijan State Oil and Industry University, Baku, Azerbaijan; Turan International Research Institute, Baku, Azerbaijan; Tashkent State Technical University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
  • Y. Sukhorebskyi Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15330/pcss.26.4.766-773

Keywords:

GEANT4, secondary electron emission, ZnO, secondary electron yield

Abstract

Computational study of secondary electron emission (SEE) from ZnO nanorod arrays deposited on Au/Si₃N₄ substrates under irradiation with 16O ions in the 10–100 MeV energy range was performed. Using a combination of SRIM and GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulations, the mechanisms of electronic stopping, electron excitation, and secondary electron yield (SEY) were systematically analyzed as functions of ion energy, nanorod radius, and substrate coverage. The results show that the dominant energy loss channel of oxygen ions in ZnO is electronic stopping, peaking at 20 MeV, which defines the optimal energy range for efficient SEE. ZnO nanorod arrays demonstrated significant advantages over continuous ZnO films, providing twice increase in SEY due to their high surface-to-volume ratio, anisotropic geometry, and local field enhancement at nanorod tips, which collectively improve both electron generation and escape. The study identified that nanorods with radii of 0.5–1.0 µm and moderate substrate coverage (35-50%) yield the best performance, achieving a favorable balance between interaction volume and electron escape probability. The findings highlight the importance of nanostructure engineering for tailoring SEE efficiency and provide predictive guidelines for the rational design of nanostructured emitters. In particular, ZnO nanorod arrays emerge as promising candidates for high-performance SEE-based detectors and diagnostic devices in plasma physics, ion-beam technologies, and space applications operating in the MeV energy regime. This work demonstrates the potential of advanced computational modeling in accelerating the development of optimized nanomaterials for electron emission and radiation detection.

References

S. Wang, O. B. Malyshev, R. Valizadeh, E. A. Seddon, M. D Cropper The secondary electron yield from transition metals, Proc. of IPAC2014, Dresden, Germany, 2403 (2014); https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2014-WEPME057.

Y. Zhao, X. Meng, S. Peng, G. Miao, Y. Gao, B. Peng, Z. Hu Physical mechanism of secondary-electron emission in Si wafers, Chinese Physics B, 33(4), 047901 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/ad1175.

A. G. Xie, S. R. Xiao, H. Y. Wu Mean escape depth of secondary electrons emitted from semiconductors and insulators. Indian Journal of Physics, 87, 1093 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-013-0355-8.

J. E. Yater Secondary electron emission and vacuum electronics, Journal of Applied Physics, 133(5) (2023); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0130972.

M. Cholewa, A. Grędysa, A. Pozaruk, T. Osipowicz, J. A. van Kan, Y. X. Dou, P. Boutachkov Investigating the Secondary Electron Emission of Nanomaterials Induced by a High‐Resolution Proton Beam, physica status solidi (b), 259(4), 2100445 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.202100445f.

Zhong Lin Wang Zinc oxide nanostructures: growth, properties and applications, Journal of Physics: Condensed matter 16.25, R829 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/16/25/R01.

Ü. Özgür, Y. I. Alivov, C. Liu, A. Teke, M. A. Reshchikov, S. Doğan, A. H. Morkoç. A comprehensive review of ZnO materials and devices, Journal of Applied Physics, 98(4) (2005); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1992666.

A. Janotti, C. G. Van de Walle Fundamentals of zinc oxide as a semiconductor, Reports on progress in Physics, 72(12), 126501 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/72/12/126501.

M. T. Noman, N. Amor, M. Petru Synthesis and applications of ZnO nanostructures (ZONSs): A review, Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences, 47(2), 99 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1080/10408436.2021.1886041.

J. L. Gomez, O. Tigli. Zinc oxide nanostructures: from growth to application, Journal of Materials Science 48 612 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-6938-5.

J. Allison, K. Amako, J. Apostolakis, P. Arce, M. Asai, T. Aso, H. Yoshida Recent developments in Geant4 Nuclear instruments and methods in physics research section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 835, 186 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2016.06.125.

J. F. Ziegler, M. D. Ziegler, J. P. Biersack SRIM– The stopping and range of ions in matter Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 268(11-12), 1818 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.091.

I. Fodchuk, A. Kotsyubynsky, A. Velychkovych, I. Hutsuliak, V. Boychuk, V. Kotsyubynsky, L. Ropyak The Effect of Ne+ Ion Implantation on the Crystal, Magnetic, and Domain Structures of Yttrium Iron Garnet Films. Crystals, 12(10), 1485 (2022); https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12101485.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-05

How to Cite

Kotsyubynsky, V., Cholewa, M., Kindrat, V., Boychuk, V., Mentynskyi, N., Abaszade, R., & Sukhorebskyi, Y. (2025). GEANT4 Study of Secondary Electron Emission in ZnO Nanorod Arrays under 10-100 MeV Oxygen Ion Irradiation. Physics and Chemistry of Solid State, 26(4), 766–773. https://doi.org/10.15330/pcss.26.4.766-773

Issue

Section

Scientific articles (Physics)

Most read articles by the same author(s)