INFLUENCE OF MACROECONOMIC FACTORS ON MANAGEMENT AND MARKETING OF COMPANIES IN THE CONTEXT OF BUSINESS COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES

Authors

  • T.M Romanyuk Vasyl Stefanyk Сarpathian (Precarpathian) National University, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Department of Entrepreneurship, Trade and Applied Economics, Shevchenko St., 57, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4928-7879
  • V.V. Stefinin Vasyl Stefanyk Сarpathian (Precarpathian) National University, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Department of Entrepreneurship, Trade and Applied Economics, Shevchenko St., 57, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9115-0068
  • A.D. Shpak Vasyl Stefanyk Сarpathian (Precarpathian) National University, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Department of Management and Marketing, Shevchenko St., 57, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4260-1683

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15330/apred.2.21.291-300

Keywords:

macroeconomic factors, strategic management, marketing, business communications, economic environment, strategy adaptation

Abstract

The article analyzes the impact of macroeconomic factors such as GDP, inflation, exchange rate, unemployment on the management system and marketing practices of companies in the context of forming effective business communication strategies. The relevance of the topic is due to the dynamism of the global economic environment, which is accompanied by inflationary fluctuations, exchange rate instability, changes in consumer demand, unemployment and other macroeconomic risks.

The purpose of the study is to establish links between key macroeconomic indicators and strategic management decisions of companies, in particular in terms of governance and external communications. The research methodology is based on systematic and interdisciplinary approaches using comparative and content analysis methods, as well as a review of scientific literature. The study takes into account the provisions of classical (Keynes, Samuelson) and modern theories of strategic management and marketing (Porter, Kotler, Johnson, Mintzberg).

The main results of the study demonstrate that companies that integrate the analysis of the macroeconomic environment into their management cycles show higher strategic flexibility, adaptability and competitiveness. It is proved that business communications under conditions of economic uncertainty should be based on the principles of transparency, openness, responsiveness and trust building. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the development of an integrated analytical model that combines macroeconomic indicators with management and marketing strategic functions. The practical significance of the results lies in the provision of applied tools for improving strategic planning, forming an effective communication policy and reducing business risks in the context of economic challenges. The approaches proposed in the article can be applied by both large corporations and small and medium-sized enterprises to develop adaptive strategies focused on sustainable development and the preservation of reputational capital. The research findings can serve as a theoretical and practical foundation for professionals in marketing, strategic management, as well as for policymakers involved in macroeconomic planning

Author Biographies

T.M Romanyuk , Vasyl Stefanyk Сarpathian (Precarpathian) National University, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Department of Entrepreneurship, Trade and Applied Economics, Shevchenko St., 57, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018, Ukraine

PhD (Econ.), Associate Professor

V.V. Stefinin, Vasyl Stefanyk Сarpathian (Precarpathian) National University, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Department of Entrepreneurship, Trade and Applied Economics, Shevchenko St., 57, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018, Ukraine

PhD (Econ.), Associate Professor

A.D. Shpak , Vasyl Stefanyk Сarpathian (Precarpathian) National University, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Department of Management and Marketing, Shevchenko St., 57, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018, Ukraine

PhD (Econ.), Associate Professor

References

Keynes, John Maynard. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Macmillan, 1936.

Samuelson, Paul A. Economics: An Introductory Analysis. McGraw-Hill, 1948.

Porter, Michael E. “The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy.” Harvard Business Review, vol. 86, no. 1, 2008, pp. 78–93.

Kotler, Philip, and Kevin Lane Keller. Marketing Management. 15th ed., Pearson, 2016.

Mintzberg, Henry, Bruce Ahlstrand, and Joseph Lampel. Strategy Safari: Your Complete Guide Through the Wilds of Strategic Management. 4th ed., Pearson, 2019.

Johnson, Gerry, et al. Exploring Strategy. 12th ed., Pearson, 2020.

Storozhuk, Olena, Tetiana Nemchenko, and Olena Zaiarniuk. “Effective Business Communications as a Strategic Component of Enterprise Risk Management.” Ekonomika ta Suspilstvo, no. 58, 2023, DOI: 10.32782/2524-0072/2023-58-5.

Lavrinenko, Svitlana, Anna Zelinska, and Olena Bezdytko. “Business Communications and Their Innovativeness in the Enterprise Management System.” Ekonomika ta Suspilstvo, no. 48, 2023, DOI: 10.32782/2524-0072/2023-48-41.

Nazarenko, Svitlana, and Nataliia Matiushenko. “The Impact of Internal Communications on the Effectiveness of Enterprises.” Ekonomika ta Suspilstvo, no. 56, 2023, DOI: 10.32782/2524-0072/2023-56-92.

Yemets, O., Shelenko, D., and I. Balaniuk. Investment Environment for the Development of Amalgamated Territorial Communities. Economic Development: Global Trends and National Peculiarities. Collective monograph, Publishing House “Baltija Publishing”, 2020, pp. 348–362, DOI: 10.30525/978-9934-588-61-7-24.

Economic Indices and Analytics. Minfin, index.minfin.com.ua/ua/. Accessed 01 Aprl. 2025.

Published

2025-06-16

How to Cite

Romanyuk , T., Stefinin, V., & Shpak , A. (2025). INFLUENCE OF MACROECONOMIC FACTORS ON MANAGEMENT AND MARKETING OF COMPANIES IN THE CONTEXT OF BUSINESS COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES. The Actual Problems of Regional Economy Development, 2(21), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.15330/apred.2.21.291-300