INTEGRATED REPORTING IN THE CONTEXT OF KEY STAKEHOLDER INFORMATION SUPPORT

Array

Authors

  • V.V. Shkromyda Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Department of Accounting and Taxation, Shevchenka str., 57, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1826-8243
  • N.Ya. Shkromyda Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Department of Accounting and Taxation, Shevchenka str., 57, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7170-2497
  • T.M. Gnatyuk Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Department of Accounting and Taxation, Shevchenko str., 57, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76010 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7984-987X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15330/apred.2.18.23-30

Keywords:

integrated reporting, historical features, non-financial indicators, framework approaches, stakeholders

Abstract

Traditional financial statements, in their form and content, have ceased to meet the information needs of users of accounting information in today's business environment, as it contains data only on the historical facts of the financial condition of the enterprise and its results. In addition to the demand for financial indicators, there is a significant focus on non-financial information from key stakeholders. In other words, the stakeholders of the existing business want to be informed about the social significance, environmental sensitivity, future results, as well as the risks and opportunities of the business entity in the future. Of course, achieving this goal is possible through the implementation of integrated reporting companies.

The aim of the study is to substantiate the theoretical and organizational basis for the implementation of integrated reporting in the context of information support of key business stakeholders through the disclosure of its historical features at the international level and search for approaches to implementing experience in domestic accounting and analytical practice.

Certainly, the promotion and standardization of integrated reporting by different institutions has achieved two important goals. The first is to increase the attention of both large and small businesses to sustainable development, as companies are actively committed to achieving their own social and environmental performance in the context of the interests of key stakeholders. Under such conditions, business becomes indifferent to the environment, social justice and prospects for future generations. Achieving the second goal provides a gradual expansion of opportunities for the existing system of accounting and reporting. After all, such circumstances expand the boundaries of accounting observation, give rise to the search for methods of valuation of new objects, as well as contribute to the improvement of accounting approaches and their reflection in the reporting.

The practical value of the research is to supplement the theoretical and methodological basis of integrated reporting, in terms of its historical transformation at the international level and the introduction of best practices in domestic accounting and analytical practice. The obtained scientific results will contribute to the development of the system of accounting and analytical reflection of the company's resources and the results of its activities related to the solution of socially important environmental and social issues.

Author Biographies

V.V. Shkromyda , Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Department of Accounting and Taxation, Shevchenka str., 57, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018

Ph.D (Econ.),  associate professor

N.Ya. Shkromyda , Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Department of Accounting and Taxation, Shevchenka str., 57, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018

Ph.D (Econ.),  associate professor

T.M. Gnatyuk , Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Department of Accounting and Taxation, Shevchenko str., 57, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76010

Ph.D (Econ.),  associate professor

References

1. Global Reporting Initiative, globalreporting.org/how-to-use-the-gri-standards/. Accessed 25 Apr.2022.
2. IFRS Practice Statement 1 «Management Commentary», ifrs.org/projects/work-plan/management-commentary/#about. Accessed 24 Apr.2022.
3. Integrated Reporting Framework, integratedreporting.org/resource/international-ir-framework/. Accessed 29 Apr.2022.
4. Shkromyda, V., Shkromyda, N., Gnatiuk, T., and M. Vasylyuk. “Reputation Management Technological Tools: a Stakeholder Approach.” Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, no.8 (3), 2021, pp. 97-105. doi.org/10.15330/jpnu.8.3.97-105.
5. On Accounting and Financial Reporting in Ukraine. Law of Ukraine. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/996-14/ed20210701#Text. Accessed 29 Apr.2022.
6. Methodical recommendations for compiling a management report. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v0982201-18#Text. Accessed 29 Apr.2022.
7. Nesterenko, O.O. Methodology and organization of formation of integrated reporting: author's ref. for science. degree doc. econ. science: special. 08.00.09, Kharkiv, 2018, 40 p.
8. Ernst & Young, ey.com/uk_ua. Accessed 25 Apr.2022.
9. KPMG, home.kpmg/xx/en/home.html. Accessed 25 Apr.2022.
10. Global Reporting Initiative, globalreporting.org/. Accessed 26 Apr.2022.
11. International Integrated Reporting Council, iasplus.com/en-gb/resources/global-organisations/iirc. Accessed 26 Apr.2022.
12. Prince's Accounting for Sustainability, accountingforsustainability.org/en/index.html. Accessed 26 Apr.2022.

Published

2022-06-29