ECONOMIC COMPLEXITY OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE BETWEEN UKRAINE AND EU COUNTRIES IN THE CONDITIONS OF BILATERAL LIBERALIZATION OF CUSTOMS REGULATION

Authors

  • S.V. Berenda V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Department of Management and Administration, Svobody Square 4, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2350-5058
  • L.I. Grygorova-Berenda V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Department of International Economic Relations and Logistics, Svobody Square 4, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8091-4333

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15330/apred.1.21.179-191

Keywords:

economic complexity index (ECI), international trade, economic integration, EU, DCFTA, customs regulation, value add chains

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of this article is to identify changes in the structural complexity of international trade between Ukraine and European Union (EU) countries under the conditions of customs liberalization, particularly within the framework of the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA), based on the calculation of the Economic Complexity Index (ECI). The research aims to reveal qualitative transformations in trade flows between Ukraine and its key partners as a result of integration processes.

Methods. The study applies the spectral analysis method to compute the Economic Complexity Index (ECI) based on matrices of Revealed Comparative Advantages (RCA) for the period 2014–2024. The analysis includes 27 EU countries, the United Kingdom, as well as China, the United States, India, Switzerland, and other trade partners. Additional indicators such as export diversification, product ubiquity, and the Method of Reflections are used to capture structural trade dynamics.

Scientific novelty. The research introduces new derived indicators — ΔECI (the gap between national and global complexity levels) and the Index of Growth in Complexity (IGS), which allow for a comprehensive assessment of the qualitative evolution of trade. An analytical grouping of countries by ΔECI level was carried out to identify partners that facilitate or hinder Ukraine's integration into markets for complex products.

Results. It is established that Ukraine’s trade with EU countries shows a higher level of economic complexity compared to global and regional averages, especially following the full implementation of the DCFTA in 2017. The highest ECI values are recorded in trade with Germany, France, and the United Kingdom. In contrast, trade with Asian and Middle Eastern countries exhibits lower complexity indicators.

Conclusions. The findings confirm the hypothesis that customs liberalization facilitates structural shifts toward higher value-added products. The Economic Complexity Index proves to be an effective tool for evaluating Ukraine’s integration into global and regional value chains (GVCs) and justifies the relevance of further institutional convergence with the EU, including the potential formation of a customs union.

Author Biographies

S.V. Berenda , V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Department of Management and Administration, Svobody Square 4, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

PhD (Econ.), Associate Professor

L.I. Grygorova-Berenda , V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Department of International Economic Relations and Logistics, Svobody Square 4, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

PhD (Econ.), Associate Professor

References

Balassa, B. "Trade Liberalisation and 'Revealed' Comparative Advantage." The Manchester School, vol. 33, no.2. 1965, onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x. Accessed 21 Apr. 2025.

Hausmann, R., and Hidalgo, C. The Atlas of Economic Complexity: Mapping Paths to Prosperity. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 2014.

Hausmann, R., and C. Hidalgo. "The Building Blocks of Economic Complexity." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 106, no. 26, 2009.

Tacchella, A., Cristelli, M., Caldarelli, G., Gabrielli, A., and L. Pietronero. "A New Metrics for Countries’ Fitness and Products’ Complexity." Scientific Reports, vol. 2, 2012, article 723.

Zaccaria, A., Cristelli, M., Tacchella, A., and L. Pietronero. "How the Taxonomy of Products Drives the Economic Development." PLOS ONE, vol. 9, no. 1, 2014.

Hromenko, S.V. "Pidvyshchennia rivnia ekonomichnoi skladnosti yak faktor zrostannia ukrainskoi ekonomiky." Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu: Mizhnarodni ekonomichni vidnosyny ta svitove hospodarstvo, vol. 29, 2020, pp. 31–37.

Haida, Y.I., Dluhopolskyi, O.V., Dluhopolskyi, A.V., Melnyk, O.I., and E.I. Melnyk. "Vzaiemozviazok rivnia ekonomichnoi skladnosti, ekolohichnykh podatkiv ta ekolohichnoi sytuatsii v krainakh svitu: rezultaty empireskoi rozvidky." Skhidna Evropa: Ekonomika, Biznes ta Upravlinnia, no. 2(25), 2020, pp. 97–102, https://doi.org/10.32782/easterneurope.25-14.

Berenda, S. V., and Hryhorova-Berenda, L. I. "Formation of Global Value Chains: Case of Agricultural Machinery Sector in Ukraine." Efektyvna ekonomika, no. 6, 2022, https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105.2022.6.22.

Di Ubaldo, M., Gasiorek, M., and T. Reilly. Trade and the Intensity of Product Regulation. UKTPO Working Paper, 2025, University of Sussex, blogs.sussex.ac.uk/uktpo/publications/trade-and-the-intensity-of-product-regulation/.

Ongan, Serdar, Huseyin Karamelikli, and Ismet Gocer. “The New J-Curve Testing Methodology on the US–UK Bilateral Trade Balance under the Brexit.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1111/sjpe.12409.

Krishna, K. “High-Tech Trade Policy.” Issues in US-EC Trade Relations, edited by Robert E. Baldwin, Carl B. Hamilton, and Andre Sapir, University of Chicago Press, 1988, pp. 285–314, www.nber.org/chapters/c5964.

Porter, M. Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. simon and schuster, 2008.

"Atlas of Economic Complexity: Ukraine–EU Trade Explorer." Harvard Growth Lab, atlas.hks.harvard.edu/explore/feasibility?exporter=country-804&importer=group-1. Accessed 21 Apr. 2025.

"UN Comtrade Database: International Trade Statistics." United Nations, comtrade.un.org/. Accessed 21 Apr. 2025.

Albeaik, S., Kaltenberg, M., Alsaleh, M., and César A. Hidalgo. “Improving the Economic Complexity Index.” Nature Communications, vol. 8, 2017, article 15399.

Caldarelli G., Cristelli M., Gabrielli A., and L. Pietronero. "A Network Analysis of Countries’ Export Flows: Firm Grounds for the Building Blocks of the Economy." PLOS ONE, vol. 7, no. 10, 2012, e47278, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047278.

Inoua, S. “A Simple Measure of Economic Complexity.” Research Policy, vol. 52, 2023, article 104793, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104793.

Penny, Mealy, Farmer, J. Doyne, and Alexander Teytelboym. A New Interpretation of the Economic Complexity Index. SSRN Working Paper, 4 Feb. 2018, ssrn.com/abstract=3075591. Accessed 21 April 2025.

Zhang, L., Weiming C., Qian, Z., Kairui, Y, and D. Gang. “Improving Economic Complexity Index: Insights from Value Added.” Economic Analysis and Policy, vol. 85, 2025.

Koch, P. “Economic Complexity and Growth: Can Value-Added Exports Better Explain the Link?” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 65, 2023, pp. 238–256.

Published

2025-06-17

How to Cite

Berenda , S., & Grygorova-Berenda , L. (2025). ECONOMIC COMPLEXITY OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE BETWEEN UKRAINE AND EU COUNTRIES IN THE CONDITIONS OF BILATERAL LIBERALIZATION OF CUSTOMS REGULATION. The Actual Problems of Regional Economy Development, 1(21), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.15330/apred.1.21.179-191