BUDGETARY POLICY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION UNDER GEOECONOMIC UNCERTAINTY: TRENDS, CHALLENGES, AND THE 2024 REFORM OF THE STABILITY AND GROWTH PACT

Authors

  • S. O. Yakubovskiy Odesa I. I. Mechnikov National University, Department of World Economy and International Economic Relations, Dvoryanska str., 2, Odesa, 65082, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1193-0241

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15330/apred.1.21.96-103

Keywords:

European Union, budgetary policy, fiscal policy, budget deficit, fiscal sustainability, Stability and Growth Pact, public finance, COVID-19 crisis, Ukraine war

Abstract

The article explores the evolution and transformation of budgetary policy in the European Union (EU) in the context of growing geoeconomic uncertainty, with a particular focus on the period from 2013 to 2024. The research is motivated by two major external shocks – the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia’s full-scale war against Ukraine – which have revealed significant weaknesses in the EU’s pre-existing fiscal governance framework and necessitated a comprehensive revision of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP). The study addresses how these crises exposed asymmetries in fiscal responses and capacities across member states, leading to divergent recovery trajectories and highlighting structural imbalances in the Union's fiscal architecture.

The primary objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of the reformed SGP, adopted in 2024, in promoting a more adaptable, resilient, and sustainable fiscal model while maintaining macroeconomic discipline. The research methodology is based on comparative analysis, combining empirical data on budget deficits with critical assessments of EU legal documents and scholarly literature. Fiscal dynamics are evaluated across a sample of EU countries characterized by either strong fiscal performance (e.g., Denmark, Ireland, Luxembourg) or persistent deficits and weak fiscal governance (e.g., Romania, France, Hungary, Poland).

The findings demonstrate that the 2024 reform introduces more flexible, country-specific adjustment paths, supported by medium-term fiscal planning, the creation of fiscal buffers, and incentives for structural reforms and public investment. However, the study also identifies several critical weaknesses – most notably, the subjectivity of the Debt Sustainability Analysis (DSA), the political nature of enforcement mechanisms, and the ongoing risk of fiscal slippage.

The scientific novelty of this research lies in its systematic assessment of the revised SGP as a response to overlapping crises and its contribution to the broader academic discourse on supranational fiscal integration. The study offers both theoretical insights into institutional adaptation under stress and practical implications for EU-level coordination, enforcement credibility, and national fiscal strategy design.

Author Biography

S. O. Yakubovskiy , Odesa I. I. Mechnikov National University, Department of World Economy and International Economic Relations, Dvoryanska str., 2, Odesa, 65082, Ukraine

D. Sc. (Econ.), Professor   

References

Eble, S., et al. “Long-Term Spending Pressures in Europe.” International Monetary Fund Departmental Papers, no. 002 (A001), 2025, https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400295805.087.A001. Accessed 19 May 2025.

Yakubovskiy, S., T. Rodionova, and D. Moroz. “The Impact of Migration on the Economy of Germany in the Conditions of Russian Aggression against Ukraine.” The Actual Problems of Regional Economy Development, vol. 1, no. 20, 2024, pp. 10–19, https://doi.org/10.15330/apred.1.20.10-19. Accessed 5 May 2025.

Nikolaieva, D., and S. Yakubovskiy. “The Dynamics of EU Countries Debt in the Context of the Global Covid-19 Pandemic.” The Actual Problems of Regional Economy Development, vol. 1, no. 19, 2023, pp. 25–38, https://doi.org/10.15330/apred.1.19.25-38. Accessed 5 May 2025.

Davide, G. “How the War in Ukraine Has Transformed the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy.” Yearbook of European Law, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yeaf003. Accessed 1 May 2025.

Blanchard, O., A. Leandro, and J. Zettelmeyer. “Redesigning EU Fiscal Rules: From Rules to Standards.” Economic Policy, no. 106, 2021, pp. 195–236, https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiab003. Accessed 1 May 2025.

Darvas, Z., and G. Wolff. “The EU’s Fiscal Stance, Its Recovery Fund, and How They Relate to the Fiscal Rules.” Bruegel Blog, 2021, www.bruegel.org/2021/03/the-eus-fiscal-stance-its-recovery-fund-and-how-they-relate-to-the-fiscal-rules/. Accessed 1 May 2025.

Oxford Analytica. “The New EU Fiscal Rules Will Restrict Budget Policy.” Expert Briefings, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1108/OXAN-DB287813. Accessed 1 Apr. 2025.

Eurostat. Deficit and Debt Data for Euro Area and EU. 2025, ec.europa.eu/eurostat/en/web/products-euro-indicators/w/2-22042025-ap. Accessed 1 May 2025.

Wijffelaars, M., E. Harn, and S. Koopman. “Are the New EU Budget Rules Fit for Long-Term Challenges and Ambitions?” SUERF Policy Note, no. 349, 2024, https://www.suerf.org/publications/suerf-policy-notes-and-briefs/are-the-new-eu-budget-rules-fit-for-long-term-challenges-and-ambitions/. Accessed 1 Apr. 2025.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-17

How to Cite

Yakubovskiy , S. O. (2025). BUDGETARY POLICY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION UNDER GEOECONOMIC UNCERTAINTY: TRENDS, CHALLENGES, AND THE 2024 REFORM OF THE STABILITY AND GROWTH PACT. The Actual Problems of Regional Economy Development, 1(21), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.15330/apred.1.21.96-103