Reviewer Guidelines

In review of an article for the Carpathian Mathematical Publications, we are interested in your overall opinion of the article and any comments you might wish to pass on to the author to assist him or her in making the article publishable. The editor would appreciate at least one paragraph indicating why this paper contributes to our knowledge of communication. If it does not, your frank and candid opinion of why not would be welcome.

Reviewers must not recommend excessive citations of their work (self-citations), another author’s work (honorary citations), or articles from the journal to which the manuscript was submitted as a means of increasing the number of citations of the reviewer/author/journal. References can be provided as needed, but they must clearly improve the quality of the manuscript under review.

GenAI tools and other large language models (LLMs) should not be used by reviewers in the preparation of review reports. Reviewers are solely responsible for the content of their reports, and the utilization of these tools may violate confidentiality, proprietary, and data privacy rights. Limited use to improve the written quality of a peer-review report, such as correcting grammar, structure, spelling, punctuation, and formatting, may be acceptable.