INTEGRATION MODELS OF REVITALIZATION OF HISTORICAL SETTLEMENTS: INDICATORS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND PROSPECTS FOR ANCIENT НALYCH

Authors

  • Olena ZHUKOVA
https://doi.org/10.15330/hal_swc.10.134-154

Keywords:

Archaeological settlement, revitalization, indicator-criteria analysis, museum method, integration model, sustainability, Ukrainian Halych
Published online: 2025-12-03

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of modern integration models of archaeological heritage museification in order to outline possible prospects for the development of the ancient settlement in Ukrainian Нalych. Analysis of the indicators of sustainable development of the model of museification of the ancient settlement within the National Reserve “Ancient Нalych” revealed the main problems associated with its effective management. Based on an empirical study of 11 museumized ancient settlements in six European countries, an indicator-criteria approach to assessing the effectiveness of museification strategies is proposed. The study allowed us to identify and empirically confirm the main criteria for the impact of heritage, as well as to consider in detail the principles of their action in socio-cultural, economic and environmental contexts. Three integration models are identified that take into account key aspects of the accessibility of archaeological heritage (physical, informational, inclusive) and its impact on sustainable development. Particular attention is paid to the concept of the outside-system – a comprehensive exhibition model that ensures the integration of archaeological monuments into the modern cultural and tourist space. The results of the study can be used to develop or improve archaeological heritage management strategies, develop effective models of its revitalization and promote its sustainable development.

References

Ashworth, G., Graham, B.. (2000). A Geography of Heritage: Power, Culture and Economy. London: Routledge. 295 pp. [in English].

Hriffen, L., Tytova, O. (2015). Vykorystannia obiektiv kulturnoi spadshchyny [The usage of cultural heritage objects]. Sivershchyna v istorii Ukrainy [Sivershchyna in the history of Ukraine]. Hlukhiv. Vyp. 8. S. 6–9. [in Ukrainian].

LVRArchäologischer Park Xanten. URL: https://apx.lvr.de/ (дата звернення: 10.03.2025).

Nocca, F. (2017). The Role of Cultural Heritage in Sustainable Development: Multidimensional Indicators as DecisionMaking Tool. Sustainability. 9 (10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101882 [in English].

Paardekooper, R. (2013). The Value of an Archaeological Open-Air Museum is in its Use. Understanding Archaeological OpenAir Museums and their Visitors. Leiden. 300 pp. [in English].

Slovanské hradistе v Mikulсіcіch. URL: https://www.masaryk.info/slovanskehradistemikulcice/ (дата звернення: 10.03.2025).

Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 208 pp. [in English].

Tytova, O. (1998). Deiaki problemy zberezhennia nerukhomykh pamiatok arkheolohii [Some problems of preserving immovable archaeological monuments]. Arkheolohichnyi litopys Livoberezhnoi Ukrainy [Archaeological Chronicle of Left-Bank Ukraine]. 1/2. S. 118. [in Ukrainian].

Tytova, O., Kepin, D. (2000). Pryntsypy orhanizatsii «arkheoparkiv» [Principles of organizing “archaeoparks”]. Visnyk UTOPIK [Bulletin of UTOPIK]. 1. S. 55–62. [in Ukrainian].

Vitchenko, D. (2009). Symvolichne oznachennia nerukhomykh pamiatok arkheolohii yak faktor yikh zberezhennia (na prykladi horodyshch) [The symbolic significance of immovable archaeological monuments as a factor in their preservation (using the example of hillforts)]. Visnyk Kharkivskoi derzhavnoi akademii dyzainu i mystetstv [Bulletin of the Kharkiv State Academy of Design and Arts]. 14, S. 8–17. [in Ukrainian].

Wyspa Lednicka. URL: https://wielkopolska.travel/ (дата звернення: 10.03.2025).

Zhukova, O. (2024). Innovatsiini tekhnolohii revitalizatsii istorychnykh mist (na prykladi Örebro ta Norrköping v Shvetsii) [Innovative technologies for the revitalization of historical cities (on the example of Örebro and Norrköping in Sweden)]. Zhovkva kriz stolittia [Zhovkva through the centuries]. VII. S. 260–282. [in Ukrainian].

Zhukova, O. (2022). Tekhnolohii muzeiefikatsii v konteksti upravlinnia obiektamy kulturnoi spadshchyny Natsionalnoho zapovidnyka «Davnii Halych» [Museification technologies in the context of cultural heritage management of the National Reserve “Ancient Halych”]. Halych i Halytska zemlia. Materialy naukovoi konferentsii [Halych and the Halych land. Materials of the scientific conference], Halych, 27 zhovtnia 2022 roku. Halych: Informatsiino-vydavnychyi sektor Natsionalnoho zapovidnyka «Davnii Halych». S. 202–206. [in Ukrainian].

Article metrics
How to Cite
ZHUKOVA, O. (2025). INTEGRATION MODELS OF REVITALIZATION OF HISTORICAL SETTLEMENTS: INDICATORS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND PROSPECTS FOR ANCIENT НALYCH. Halych. Scientific Work Collection , 10, 134–154. https://doi.org/10.15330/hal_swc.10.134-154

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.